
pmid: 23041720
handle: 20.500.14243/279734 , 11573/929168 , 11585/127029
Two experiments, one on school-aged children and one on adults, explored the mechanisms underlying responses to an image prime (hand vs. control object) followed by graspable objects that were, in certain cases, dangerous. Participants were presented with different primes (a male, a female and a robotic grasping-hand; a male and a female static-hand; a control stimulus) and objects representing two risk levels (neutral and dangerous). The task required that a natural/artifact categorization task be performed by pressing different keys. In both adults and children graspable objects activated a facilitating motor response, while dangerous objects evoked aversive affordances, generating an interference-effect. Both children and adults were sensitive to the distinction between biological and non-biological hands, however detailed resonant mechanisms related to the hand-prime gender emerged only in adults. Implications for how the concept of "dangerous object" develops and the relationship between resonant mechanisms and perception of danger are discussed.
Dangerous objects, Adult, Male, Hand Strength, EMPATHY; DANGEROUS OBJECTS; MOTOR RESONANCE; AFFORDANCES; EMBODIED COGNITION, Pain, Recognition, Psychology, Motor Activity, Dangerous Behavior, Repetition Priming, Reaction Time, Humans, Female, Empathy, Child, Affordances, Motor resonance, Psychomotor Performance
Dangerous objects, Adult, Male, Hand Strength, EMPATHY; DANGEROUS OBJECTS; MOTOR RESONANCE; AFFORDANCES; EMBODIED COGNITION, Pain, Recognition, Psychology, Motor Activity, Dangerous Behavior, Repetition Priming, Reaction Time, Humans, Female, Empathy, Child, Affordances, Motor resonance, Psychomotor Performance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 65 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
