
People can maintain accurate representations of visual changes without necessarily being aware of them. Here, we investigate whether a similar phenomenon (implicit change detection) also exists in touch. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants detected the presence of a change between two consecutively-presented tactile displays. Tactile change blindness was observed, with participants failing to report the presence of tactile change. Critically, however, when participants had to make a forced choice response regarding the number of stimuli presented in the two displays, their performance was significantly better than chance (i.e., implicit change detection was observed). Experiment 3 demonstrated that tactile change detection does not necessarily involve a shift of spatial attention toward the location of change, regardless of whether the change is explicitly detected. We conclude that tactile change detection likely results from comparing representations of the two displays, rather than by directing spatial attention to the location of the change.
Adult, Male, Awareness, Middle Aged, Attention; Awareness; Change blindness; Consciousness; Implicit processing; Touch;, implicit, touch, tactile, body, attention, Young Adult, Discrimination, Psychological, Touch Perception, Pattern Recognition, Physiological, Physical Stimulation, Reaction Time, Humans, Attention, Female
Adult, Male, Awareness, Middle Aged, Attention; Awareness; Change blindness; Consciousness; Implicit processing; Touch;, implicit, touch, tactile, body, attention, Young Adult, Discrimination, Psychological, Touch Perception, Pattern Recognition, Physiological, Physical Stimulation, Reaction Time, Humans, Attention, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
