
pmid: 28987223
Craniomaxillofacial trauma management has continued to improve and evolve as a result of advances in technology and scientific inquiry. Controversies exist where there is little evidence-based literature to guide treatment in frontal sinus management, rigid versus absorbable fixation, open versus closed treatment of mandibular condyle fractures, extraction of teeth in the line of fracture, optimal timing for repair of mandible fractures, antibiotic use for facial wounds and fractures, and reconstructive materials in orbital fracture reconstruction. This article reviews current literature to resolve some of the controversies, to improve patient care by reducing variability and uncertainty in the optimal management of facial trauma patients.
Skull Fractures, Fracture Fixation, Mandibular Fractures, Oral Surgical Procedures, Tooth Extraction, Humans, Maxillofacial Injuries, Conservative Treatment, Anti-Bacterial Agents
Skull Fractures, Fracture Fixation, Mandibular Fractures, Oral Surgical Procedures, Tooth Extraction, Humans, Maxillofacial Injuries, Conservative Treatment, Anti-Bacterial Agents
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
