
pmid: 16006097
We described an interactive method for correcting spatial distortion in histology samples, applied them to a large set of image data, and quantitatively evaluated the quality of the corrections. We demonstrated registration of histology samples to photographs of macroscopic tissue samples and to MR images. We first described methods for obtaining corresponding fiducial and anatomical points, including a new technique for determining boundary correspondence points. We then describe experimental methods for tissue preparation, including a technique for adding color-coded internal and boundary ink marks that are used to validate the method by measuring the registration error. We applied four different transformations with internal and boundary correspondence points, and measured the distance error between other internal ink fiducials. A large number of boundary points, typically 20-30, and at least two internal points were required for accurate warping registration. Interior errors with the transformation methods were ordered: thin plate spline (TPS) approximately non-warping<
Histology, Histocompatibility Testing, Humans, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Algorithms, United States
Histology, Histocompatibility Testing, Humans, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Algorithms, United States
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
