
A number of Game Strategies (GS) have been developed in past decades. They have been used in the fields of economics, engineering, computer science and biology due to their efficiency in solving design optimization problems. In addition, research in multi-objective (MO) and multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) has focused on developing robust and efficient optimization methods to produce a set of high quality solutions with low computational cost. In this paper, two optimization techniques are considered; the first optimization method uses multi-fidelity hierarchical Pareto optimality. The second optimization method uses the combination of two Game Strategies; Nash-equilibrium and Pareto optimality. The paper shows how Game Strategies can be hybridised and coupled to Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEA) to accelerate convergence speed and to produce a set of high quality solutions. Numerical results obtained from both optimization methods are compared in terms of computational expense and model quality. The benefits of using Hybrid-Game Strategies are clearly demonstrated
Numerical optimization and variational techniques, Engineering, Civil, Game Strategies, Engineering, Multidisciplinary, Nash-equilibrium, Shape optimization, Engineering, Ocean, Hybrid-Game, Engineering, Aerospace, Engineering, Biomedical, multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA), Computer Science, Software Engineering, Pareto front, Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm (MOEA), Engineering, Marine, 620, 004, Flow control and optimization for compressible fluids and gas dynamics, Engineering, Manufacturing, Engineering, Mechanical, hybrid-game, shape optimization, Engineering, Industrial, game strategies
Numerical optimization and variational techniques, Engineering, Civil, Game Strategies, Engineering, Multidisciplinary, Nash-equilibrium, Shape optimization, Engineering, Ocean, Hybrid-Game, Engineering, Aerospace, Engineering, Biomedical, multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA), Computer Science, Software Engineering, Pareto front, Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm (MOEA), Engineering, Marine, 620, 004, Flow control and optimization for compressible fluids and gas dynamics, Engineering, Manufacturing, Engineering, Mechanical, hybrid-game, shape optimization, Engineering, Industrial, game strategies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
