
Digital image-based elasto-tomography (DIET) is an emerging method for non-invasive breast cancer screening. Effective clinical application of the DIET system requires highly accurate motion tracking of the surface of an actuated breast with minimal computation. Normalized cross correlation (NCC) is the most robust correlation measure for determining similarity between points in two or more images providing an accurate foundation for motion tracking. However, even using fast Fourier transform (FFT) methods, it is too computationally intense for rapidly managing several large images. A significantly faster method of calculating the NCC is presented that uses rectangular approximations in place of randomly placed landmark points or the natural marks on the breast. These approximations serve as an optimal set of basis functions that are automatically detected, dramatically reducing computational requirements. To prove the concept, the method is shown to be 37-150 times faster than the FFT-based NCC with the same accuracy for simulated data, a visco-elastic breast phantom experiment and human skin. Clinically, this approach enables thousands of randomly placed points to be rapidly and accurately tracked providing high resolution for the DIET system.
Phantoms, Imaging, Fields of Research::290000 Engineering and Technology::291500 Biomedical Engineering::291504 Biomechanical engineering, Breast Neoplasms, basis functions, breast cancer screening, Radiography, surface motion tracking, normalized cross correlation, landmark points, Humans, Female, Tomography, Algorithms
Phantoms, Imaging, Fields of Research::290000 Engineering and Technology::291500 Biomedical Engineering::291504 Biomechanical engineering, Breast Neoplasms, basis functions, breast cancer screening, Radiography, surface motion tracking, normalized cross correlation, landmark points, Humans, Female, Tomography, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 76 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
