
Meibography is reported to be important in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) evaluation. Our purpose was to investigate the usefulness of a standard infra-red video security camera in meibography.Meibographs were taken of the right lower lid of 17 subjects (female 10; age = 44.3 years ±13.3 SD), randomly selected from the patient pool of Horst Riede GmbH, Weinheim, Germany. Meibomian glands (MG) were photographed by an near adapted infra-red video security camera and extend of MG loss (MGL) was measured by digital image analyzes. Lipid-layer and non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT) was measured by tearscope, dry eye symptoms were evaluated by the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Correlations between MGL scores and ocular signs, tearfilm and symptoms were analyzed by Pearsons, differences between gender by U-test. The ability of MGL to predict dry eye symptoms was evaluated by area under the receiver operative characteristic curve (AUC).MGL scores were significantly correlated to lipid-layer pattern (r = -0.68, p = 0.001) NIBUT (-0.46, 0.032) OSDI (0.89, 0.001) and age (0.61, 0.005). MGL was significantly larger in female (p = 0.001). AUC of MGL was 95.8% (p = 0.001; sensitivity = 88.9%; specificity = 87.5%; threshold = 32.3%).MGL is a predictive test of dry eye symptoms. The analyzed significant correlation between MGL and tearfilm and dry eye symptoms indicates the usefulness of the non-contact IR meibograph (PNCM).
Adult, Male, Surface Properties, Video Recording, Meibomian Glands, Reproducibility of Results, Pilot Projects, Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological, Diagnosis, Differential, ROC Curve, Tears, Humans, Dry Eye Syndromes, Female
Adult, Male, Surface Properties, Video Recording, Meibomian Glands, Reproducibility of Results, Pilot Projects, Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological, Diagnosis, Differential, ROC Curve, Tears, Humans, Dry Eye Syndromes, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 131 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
