
pmid: 41344436
Gene therapy, a technique that seeks to modify or manipulate the expression of a gene or to alter the biological properties of living cells for therapeutic use, has evolved significantly. The design of gene therapy clinical trials, and in particular outcome monitoring and end point design, is of paramount clinical, scientific, and regulatory relevance, with practical, ethical, and financial implications for health care systems and society at large. Gene therapies are potentially irreversible, which demands that principal effects of the drug on the disease pathophysiology as well as clinical meaningfulness of the therapy, via end point specification, is well defined and measured reliably. Considering that gene therapy trials typically target rare disease and/or are resource-intensive, the sample sizes are limited, which creates a unique set of challenges. This further demands careful selection in the choice of the appropriate and feasible end points, best determined through multidisciplinary discussions that take into consideration the most appropriate statistical approach for the data analysis. In this review, we discuss the framework necessary for rational and robust outcome monitoring for gene therapy trials, and we review the currently used end points for gene therapy trials.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
