
Prone positioning was first proposed in the 1970s as a method to improve gas exchange in ARDS. Subsequent observations of dramatic improvement in oxygenation with simple patient rotation motivated the next several decades of research. This work elucidated the physiological mechanisms underlying changes in gas exchange and respiratory mechanics with prone ventilation. However, translating physiological improvements into a clinical benefit has proved challenging; several contemporary trials showed no major clinical benefits with prone positioning. By optimizing patient selection and treatment protocols, the recent Proning Severe ARDS Patients (PROSEVA) trial demonstrated a significant mortality benefit with prone ventilation. This trial, and subsequent meta-analyses, support the role of prone positioning as an effective therapy to reduce mortality in severe ARDS, particularly when applied early with other lung-protective strategies. This review discusses the physiological principles, clinical evidence, and practical application of prone ventilation in ARDS.
Clinical Sciences, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, Respiratory System, 610, Clinical sciences, Cardiovascular medicine and haematology, Rare Diseases, Clinical Research, Prone Position, Humans, lung injury, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Lung, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, hypoxemia, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Pulmonary Gas Exchange, ventilation, critical care, Good Health and Well Being, Treatment Outcome, Respiratory, Respiratory Mechanics, ARDS
Clinical Sciences, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, Respiratory System, 610, Clinical sciences, Cardiovascular medicine and haematology, Rare Diseases, Clinical Research, Prone Position, Humans, lung injury, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Lung, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, hypoxemia, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Pulmonary Gas Exchange, ventilation, critical care, Good Health and Well Being, Treatment Outcome, Respiratory, Respiratory Mechanics, ARDS
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 304 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
