
pmid: 21683917
During the Outreau case in France, 13 individuals were falsely accused of child sexual abuse and incarcerated. The author of this article testified as a psychiatric expert when the convictions were appealed. He explains how purposeful false statements by adults, inept expert witnesses, and the judicial assumption that children do not lie converged to create a tragic legal outcome. This article explains how psychiatric experts should conduct evaluations in cases of alleged child sexual abuse.
Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Male, Deception, Fantasy, Foster Home Care, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Risk Factors, Humans, Cooperative Behavior, Child, Expert Testimony, Judicial Role, Child Abuse, Sexual, Incest, Child Custody, Child, Preschool, Female, France, Homicide
Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Male, Deception, Fantasy, Foster Home Care, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Risk Factors, Humans, Cooperative Behavior, Child, Expert Testimony, Judicial Role, Child Abuse, Sexual, Incest, Child Custody, Child, Preschool, Female, France, Homicide
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
