
Abstract The occurrence of plastic shrinkage cracking in fresh concrete may significantly compromise its service life. Therefore, it is essential to reduce the crack width with appropriate, efficient and effective methods. This study is dedicated to comparing the ability of passive mitigation methods including: Shrinkage Reducing Admixtures (SRA), accelerators based on Calcium Silicate Hydrate seeding agents and curing compounds, in controlling the plastic shrinkage cracking in the drying state. The performance of the different admixtures was evaluated according to the ASTM C1579-13 standard. Furthermore, a series of complementary test methods were utilized to study the mechanism of action of the different admixtures. Among the crack mitigation methods that were studied in this paper, SRA were the most effective.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
