
Patterns of gene expression can be used to characterize and classify neuronal types. It is challenging, however, to generate taxonomies that fulfill the essential criteria of being comprehensive, harmonizing with conventional classification schemes, and lacking superfluous subdivisions of genuine types. To address these challenges, we used massively parallel single-cell RNA profiling and optimized computational methods on a heterogeneous class of neurons, mouse retinal bipolar cells (BCs). From a population of ∼25,000 BCs, we derived a molecular classification that identified 15 types, including all types observed previously and two novel types, one of which has a non-canonical morphology and position. We validated the classification scheme and identified dozens of novel markers using methods that match molecular expression to cell morphology. This work provides a systematic methodology for achieving comprehensive molecular classification of neurons, identifies novel neuronal types, and uncovers transcriptional differences that distinguish types within a class.
Genetic Markers, Male, Retinal Bipolar Cells, Transcription, Genetic, 1.1 Normal biological development and functioning, Inbred Strains, Mice, Inbred Strains, Mice, Transgenic, Medical and Health Sciences, Transgenic, Mice, Genetic, Underpinning research, Genetics, Animals, Cluster Analysis, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Neurosciences, Biological Sciences, Amacrine Cells, RNA, Female, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome, Sequence Analysis, Transcription, Biotechnology, Developmental Biology
Genetic Markers, Male, Retinal Bipolar Cells, Transcription, Genetic, 1.1 Normal biological development and functioning, Inbred Strains, Mice, Inbred Strains, Mice, Transgenic, Medical and Health Sciences, Transgenic, Mice, Genetic, Underpinning research, Genetics, Animals, Cluster Analysis, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Neurosciences, Biological Sciences, Amacrine Cells, RNA, Female, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome, Sequence Analysis, Transcription, Biotechnology, Developmental Biology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1K | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.01% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.01% |
