
pmid: 16183211
Lysosomal cysteine cathepsins have been implicated in tumor progression. This study is aimed to reveal differential expression and compare the prognostic significance of cathepsins B and L in glioma patients.The histological slides of 82 patients with primary astrocytic tumors were reviewed. We evaluated the immunostaining of the cathepsins in tumor and endothelial cells.Cathepsins B and L stained positive in 98 and 88% of cases, respectively. The total score was significantly higher in malignant than in benign tumors, both for cathepsin B (p<0.001) and for cathepsin L (p<0.01). The IHC score in endothelial cells in the malignant group was significantly higher only for cathepsin B (p<0.0001). Survival analysis indicated that in contrast to the prognostic significance of total cathepsin B and endothelial cells associated cathepsin B for shorter patients' survival, the prognostic role of cathepsin L was not confirmed.Cathepsin L is preferentially expressed in tumor cells, increasing with glioma progression, but is not significantly associated with new vasculature of glioblastoma. In contrast to cathepsin B, cathepsin L has no prognostic impact, suggesting different roles of the two cathepsins in glioma progression.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Neovascularization, Pathologic, Brain Neoplasms, Cathepsin L, Gene Expression Profiling, Glioma, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Cathepsins, Cathepsin B, Cysteine Endopeptidases, Child, Preschool, Disease Progression, Humans, Female, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Neovascularization, Pathologic, Brain Neoplasms, Cathepsin L, Gene Expression Profiling, Glioma, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Cathepsins, Cathepsin B, Cysteine Endopeptidases, Child, Preschool, Disease Progression, Humans, Female, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 55 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
