
The measurement of glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) has a pivotal role in monitoring glycemic state in diabetic patients. Furthermore, the American Diabetes Association has recently recommended the use of HbA(1c) for diabetes diagnosis, but a clear definition of the clinically allowable measurement error is still lacking. Information on biological variability of the analyte can be used to achieve this goal.We systematically reviewed the published studies on the biological variation of HbA(1c) to check consistency of available data in order to accurately define analytical goals.The nine recruited studies were limited by choice of analytic methodology, population selection, protocol application and statistical analyses.There is an urgent need to determine biological variability of HbA(1c) using a specific and traceable assay, appropriate protocol and appropriate statistical evaluation of data.
Glycated Hemoglobin, Observer Variation, Biological variability; Diabetes mellitus; Glycated hemoglobin, Research Design, Epidemiologic Research Design, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Reproducibility of Results
Glycated Hemoglobin, Observer Variation, Biological variability; Diabetes mellitus; Glycated hemoglobin, Research Design, Epidemiologic Research Design, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Reproducibility of Results
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 56 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
