Abstract Recent surveys from upper limb amputees indicate the sentiment that prosthetic hands do not function in a life-like manner and are not intuitively controlled. Thus, two methods of control for a prosthetic hand are presented. A proportional derivative (PD) force controller is compared to a novel biomimetic application of sliding mode control. The biomimetic sliding mode (BSM) controller was designed to map human muscle signals into prosthesis motor command signals in a physiologically expected manner. The BSM and PD controllers were evaluated analytically and subjectively by one amputee and nine nonamputee test subjects. The posture of the hands of the nonamputee test subjects were measured with a CyberGlove and used to determine if the position of the prosthesis (when driven by both controllers) was highly correlated to the posture of the human hands. Force tracking experiments were also performed by all test subjects with both controllers to evaluate the ability to control the applied force. Finally, a dual object lifting task was performed by all test subjects to determine if the mapping of electromyogram (EMG) signals with the BSM controller resulted in physiologically expected motions. A nonparametric Mann–Whitney U -test was performed on the subjective evaluations to determine the statistical significance of the evaluations. The BSM controller was shown to replicate the posture of the human hand much more accurately than the PD force controller. The BSM controller also enabled better average force tracking results and higher success rates with the dual object lifting experiment while the same task was nearly impossible to perform with the PD controller. Finally, the BSM controller was subjectively rated to be more similar to control in comparison to the human hand with respect to position and force.