
pmid: 40795449
The clinical use of three disease-modifying drugs approved in Japan for the treatment of spinal muscle atrophy (SMA) has increased. Therefore, there is an increasing need for biomarkers to evaluate therapeutic interventions.Individuals were treated with risdiplam (25 patients, male:female =12:13) and evaluated before starting the medication and after 1, 2, 5, 8, and 12 months. Assessments included the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE), Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM), compound muscle action potential (CMAP) of the ulnar and peroneal nerves, and spinal muscular atrophy independence scale upper limb module (SMAIS-ULM) questionnaire scores of the patient and caregiver. Blood tests and survival motor neuron (SMN) protein levels were also evaluated.The HFMSE and RULM scores increased significantly at 5 (p = 0.058 and p = 0.003, respectively), 8 (p = 0.024 and p = 0.016, respectively), and 12 months (p = 0.034 and p = 0.046, respectively). Peroneal CMAP scores also increased at eight months (p = 0.038) compared with those before treatment initiation. SMN protein levels were elevated after one month of treatment (p = 0.001) and were maintained throughout the observation period.Median SMN protein levels increased significantly after one month of risdiplam administration with some fluctuations. After five months of treatment, motor function, CMAP, and SMAIS-ULM caregiver scores improved. SMN protein is an appropriate biomarker for monitoring and evaluating the efficacy of risdiplam treatment in SMA.
Male, Muscular Atrophy, Spinal, Pyrimidines, Adolescent, Japan, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Child, Survival of Motor Neuron 1 Protein, Azo Compounds, Biomarkers
Male, Muscular Atrophy, Spinal, Pyrimidines, Adolescent, Japan, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Child, Survival of Motor Neuron 1 Protein, Azo Compounds, Biomarkers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
