
pmid: 27345648
Advanced endoscopy has evolved from diagnostic ERCP to an ever-increasing array of therapeutic procedures including EUS with FNA, ablative therapies, deep enteroscopy, luminal stenting, endoscopic suturing and endoscopic mucosal resection among others. As these procedures have become increasingly more complex, the risk of potential complications has also risen. Training in advanced endoscopy involves more than obtaining a minimum number of therapeutic procedures. The means of assessing a trainee's competence level and ability to practice independently continues to be a matter of debate. The use of quality indicators to measure performance levels may be beneficial as more advanced techniques and procedures become available.
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde, Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery, Humans, Education, Medical, Continuing, Clinical Competence, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Endosonography, Quality Indicators, Health Care
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde, Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery, Humans, Education, Medical, Continuing, Clinical Competence, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Endosonography, Quality Indicators, Health Care
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
