Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Bonearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Bone
Article . 2017 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Differential responses of mechanosensitive osteocyte proteins in fore- and hindlimbs of hindlimb-unloaded rats

Authors: Corinne E, Metzger; Jessica E, Brezicha; Jon P, Elizondo; S Anand, Narayanan; Harry A, Hogan; Susan A, Bloomfield;

Differential responses of mechanosensitive osteocyte proteins in fore- and hindlimbs of hindlimb-unloaded rats

Abstract

Osteocytes are believed to be the primary mechanosensors of bone tissue, signaling to osteoblasts and osteoclasts by releasing specific proteins. Sclerostin, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) are osteocyte proteins that signal to osteoblasts. The primary objective of this study was to determine if osteocyte protein response to mechanical unloading is restricted to the unloaded bone using the hindlimb unloading (HU) rodent model. We also examined tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) due to its interactions with all three osteocyte proteins. We hypothesized that unloaded hindlimb cancellous bone would have an altered osteocyte protein (sclerostin, IL-6, and IGF-I) response compared to controls, while the response in the weight-bearing forelimb would not differ from ambulating controls. Male Sprague Dawley rats (7-mo old) experienced either HU (n=7) or normal cage activity (CON; n=7) for 28days. The unloaded distal femur and the weight-bearing proximal humerus were compared in HU vs CON. Metaphyseal bone density was reduced in the HU rats' hindlimb, but not in the proximal humerus, compared to CON values. Osteocyte density was 30% lower in the HU distal femur, but not different from CON in the proximal humerus. %Sclerostin+osteocytes in the distal femur were higher in HU compared to CON, but lower in the proximal humerus. Both %IGF-I+ and %IL-6+ osteocytes were lower in the distal femur for HU, but higher in the proximal humerus for HU. Osterix surface, a marker of osteoblasts, was lower in HU in the distal femur; however, the proximal humerus had more %osterix+surface in HU. In HU %Cathepsin K+ surface, a marker of osteoclasts, was higher in the distal femur and lower in the proximal humerus. %TNF-α+osteocytes were no different from CON in either bone site. HU proximal humerus osteocyte protein responses of sclerostin, IL-6, and IGF-I changed in the opposite direction as observed in the distal femur within the same animal. The opposite response of osteocyte proteins and osteoblast surface in hind- and forelimb bones within the same animal suggests that, while osteocytes in the unloaded hindlimb sense a lack of mechanical strain, osteocytes in the weight-bearing forelimb in HU animals sense some increase in local strain and generate molecular signaling to osteoblasts.

Keywords

Male, Tibia, Proteins, Reproducibility of Results, Cell Count, Mechanotransduction, Cellular, Models, Biological, Osteocytes, Hindlimb, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Hindlimb Suspension, Bone Density, Forelimb, Animals, Femur, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    25
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
25
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!