Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Plastic R...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Serveur académique lausannois
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

First experience from 200 cases with a new breast tissue expander for multi-stage pre-pectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomy

Authors: Limido, E.; Bonomi, F.; Guggenheim, L.; Peradze, N.; Parodi, C.; Schmauss, D.; Weinzierl, A.; +1 Authors

First experience from 200 cases with a new breast tissue expander for multi-stage pre-pectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomy

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer globally, and mastectomy rates are increasing. Tissue expander-based breast reconstruction is used when direct-to-implant methods are unsuitable. A novel magnetic resonance imaging compatible breast tissue expander has recently been introduced. This study aims to evaluate its clinical use in pre-pectoral breast reconstruction and its complication profile. A monocentric prospective cohort study included women undergoing expander-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy with the new tissue expander between August 2020 and October 2024. The expanders were placed in a pre-pectoral plane with optional use of acellular dermal matrices in selected cases. Demographic data, comorbidities, and surgical details were analyzed. Tissue expander-independent and -dependent complications were assessed. A total of 200 tissue expanders were implanted in 146 patients (92 unilateral, 54 bilateral). Major complications requiring expander replacement included infection (3.0%), partial necrosis of the mastectomy flap (2.5%), wound dehiscence (1.0%), hematoma (1.0%), and seroma (0.5%). Tissue expander rotation and/or flipping, as well as iatrogenic rupture, occurred in 2% and 3.5% of all cases. Definitive removal was required in ten cases, mainly due to mastectomy flap necrosis and wound dehiscence with or without expander exposure (2.5%), as well as infection (2.0%). The new breast tissue expander features a biocompatible surface that does not adhere to adjacent tissues and therefore needs fixation alongside the inframammary fold, particularly if used in the pre-pectoral plane, contributing to a low complication rate. While short-term results are promising, long-term follow-up on a larger scale is needed to confirm these outcomes.

Keywords

Humans; Female; Tissue Expansion Devices/adverse effects; Mastectomy/methods; Middle Aged; Breast Neoplasms/surgery; Prospective Studies; Adult; Mammaplasty/methods; Mammaplasty/instrumentation; Mammaplasty/adverse effects; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology; Postoperative Complications/etiology; Tissue Expansion/instrumentation; Tissue Expansion/methods; Tissue Expansion/adverse effects; Aged; Biocompatibility; Breast cancer; Breast tissue expander; Composite breast reconstruction; Mastectomy; Multi-staged pre-pectoral breast reconstruction

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Green
hybrid
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research