
pmid: 23036833
We present a system for marking the skin during oral surgical operations. This system identifies teeth to be extracted or exposed under general anaesthesia. Removal of the wrong tooth can cause appreciable morbidity and leaves the surgeon and organisation liable for litigation and scrutiny by regulatory bodies. A recent review of claims to the NHS litigation authority between 1995 and 2010 showed that in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, dentoalveolar surgery resulted in the largest number of claims for negligence, of which removal of the wrong tooth was one of the most common. In 2010/2011 the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) of the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) were notified of 20 incidents when the wrong tooth had been extracted, which accounted for 5% of all incidents reported. We have therefore developed a robust marking system for oral surgical procedures in our hospital, which improves on the World Health Organisation (WHO) checklist. We have audited patients' perceptions and the clinical application of our marking system, and have shown that the system is welcomed by patients, and is simple and effective for clinicians to use.
Adult, Male, Medical Errors, Tattooing, Attitude of Health Personnel, Oral Surgical Procedures, Middle Aged, World Health Organization, Checklist, England, State Dentistry, Patient Satisfaction, Tooth Extraction, Humans, Female, Patient Safety, Child, Tooth
Adult, Male, Medical Errors, Tattooing, Attitude of Health Personnel, Oral Surgical Procedures, Middle Aged, World Health Organization, Checklist, England, State Dentistry, Patient Satisfaction, Tooth Extraction, Humans, Female, Patient Safety, Child, Tooth
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
