Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao British Journal of O...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Marking the skin for oral surgical procedures: improving the WHO checklist

Authors: Greg J, Knepil; Caroline T, Harvey; Andrea N, Beech;

Marking the skin for oral surgical procedures: improving the WHO checklist

Abstract

We present a system for marking the skin during oral surgical operations. This system identifies teeth to be extracted or exposed under general anaesthesia. Removal of the wrong tooth can cause appreciable morbidity and leaves the surgeon and organisation liable for litigation and scrutiny by regulatory bodies. A recent review of claims to the NHS litigation authority between 1995 and 2010 showed that in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, dentoalveolar surgery resulted in the largest number of claims for negligence, of which removal of the wrong tooth was one of the most common. In 2010/2011 the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) of the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) were notified of 20 incidents when the wrong tooth had been extracted, which accounted for 5% of all incidents reported. We have therefore developed a robust marking system for oral surgical procedures in our hospital, which improves on the World Health Organisation (WHO) checklist. We have audited patients' perceptions and the clinical application of our marking system, and have shown that the system is welcomed by patients, and is simple and effective for clinicians to use.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Medical Errors, Tattooing, Attitude of Health Personnel, Oral Surgical Procedures, Middle Aged, World Health Organization, Checklist, England, State Dentistry, Patient Satisfaction, Tooth Extraction, Humans, Female, Patient Safety, Child, Tooth

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!