
Daily, weekly, ten-daily, and monthly monsoon runoff and sediment yield from an Indian catchment were simulated using back propagation artificial neural network (BPANN) technique, and the results compared with the observed and with those due to single- and multi-input linear transfer function models. Normalising the input by its maximum for both the pattern and batch learning algorithms in BPANN, the model parsimony was achieved through network pruning utilising error sensitivity to weight a criterion, and it was generalised through cross-validation. The performance based on correlation coefficient and coefficient of efficiency suggested the pattern-learned artificial neural network (ANN) based runoff simulation to be superior to both single- and multi-input models in calibration. The single-input models were however superior in verification. The ANN based sediment-yield models performed better than both single- and multi-input models in calibration as well as cross-validation/verification.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 68 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
