
pmid: 27125840
Lateral flow biosensors are a leading technology in point-of-care diagnostics due to their simplicity, rapidness and low cost. Their primacy in this arena continues through technological breakthroughs such as multiplexing: the detection of more than one biomarker in a single assay. Multiplexing capacity is critical for improving diagnostic efficiency, enhancing the diagnostic precision for specific diseases and reducing diagnostic cost. Here we review, for the first time, the various types and strategies employed for creating multiplexed lateral flow biosensors. These are classified into four main categories in terms of specific application or multiplexing level, namely linear, parameter, spatial and conceptual. We describe the practical applications and implications for each approach and compare their advantages and disadvantages. Importantly, multiplexing is still subject to limitations of the traditional lateral flow biosensor, such as sensitivity and specificity. However, by pushing the limitations of the traditional medium into the multiplex arena, several technological breakthroughs are emerging with novel solutions that further expand the utility of lateral flow biosensing for point-of-care applications.
sandwich assay, Paper, multiplexing, Point-of-Care Systems, 600, 2D paper network, Biosensing Techniques, Equipment Design, FoR 0301 (Analytical Chemistry), Microfluidic Analytical Techniques, point-of-care, FoR 1007 (Nanotechnology), FoR 0903 (Biomedical Engineering), logic gates, Animals, Humans, lateral flow biosensor
sandwich assay, Paper, multiplexing, Point-of-Care Systems, 600, 2D paper network, Biosensing Techniques, Equipment Design, FoR 0301 (Analytical Chemistry), Microfluidic Analytical Techniques, point-of-care, FoR 1007 (Nanotechnology), FoR 0903 (Biomedical Engineering), logic gates, Animals, Humans, lateral flow biosensor
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 191 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
