
pmid: 25285763
This study investigated the possibility that the electrical conductivity of carbon cloth accelerates direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET) in co-cultures. Carbon cloth accelerated metabolism of DIET co-cultures (Geobacter metallireducens-Geobacter sulfurreducens and G.metallireducens-Methanosarcina barkeri) but did not promote metabolism of co-cultures performing interspecies H2 transfer (Desulfovibrio vulgaris-G.sulfurreducens). On the other hand, DIET co-cultures were not stimulated by poorly conductive cotton cloth. Mutant strains lacking electrically conductive pili, or pili-associated cytochromes participated in DIET only in the presence of carbon cloth. In co-cultures promoted by carbon cloth, cells were primarily associated with the cloth although the syntrophic partners were too far apart for cell-to-cell biological electrical connections to be feasible. Carbon cloth seemingly mediated interspecies electron transfer between the distant syntrophic partners. These results suggest that the ability of carbon cloth to accelerate DIET should be considered in anaerobic digester designs that incorporate carbon cloth.
Carbon cloth, Membranes, Syntrophy, Direct interspecies electron transfer, Microbial Consortia, Electric Conductivity, Membranes, Artificial, Cell Communication, Carbon, Coculture Techniques, Electron Transport, Carbon/chemistry, Cell Communication/physiology, Artificial, Methanosarcina, Materials Testing, Coculture Techniques/methods, Geobacter, Symbiosis, Oxidation-Reduction
Carbon cloth, Membranes, Syntrophy, Direct interspecies electron transfer, Microbial Consortia, Electric Conductivity, Membranes, Artificial, Cell Communication, Carbon, Coculture Techniques, Electron Transport, Carbon/chemistry, Cell Communication/physiology, Artificial, Methanosarcina, Materials Testing, Coculture Techniques/methods, Geobacter, Symbiosis, Oxidation-Reduction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 358 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
