
pmid: 25079207
Anaerobic co-digestion has been widely investigated, but there is limited analysis of interaction between substrates. The objective of this work was to assess the role of carbohydrates, protein and lipids in co-digestion behaviour separately, and together. Two sets of batch tests were done, each set consisting of the mono-digestion of three substrates, and the co-digestion of seven mixtures. The first was done with pure substrates--cellulose, casein and olive oil--while in the second slaughterhouse waste--paunch, blood and fat--were used as carbohydrate, protein and lipid sources, respectively. Synergistic effects were mainly improvement of process kinetics without a significant change in biodegradability. Kinetics improvement was linked to the mitigation of inhibitory compounds, particularly fats dilution. The exception was co-digestion of paunch with lipids, which resulted in an improved final yield with model based analysis indicating the presence of paunch improved degradability of the fatty feed.
Waste Products, 1502 Bioengineering, 660, Codigestion, LCFA inhibition, Lipids, Modelling, 2311 Waste Management and Disposal, Refuse Disposal, Slaughterhouse, Biodegradation, Environmental, 2305 Environmental Engineering, Anaerobic digestion, Animals, Cattle, Anaerobiosis, Organic Chemicals, Methane, Abattoirs
Waste Products, 1502 Bioengineering, 660, Codigestion, LCFA inhibition, Lipids, Modelling, 2311 Waste Management and Disposal, Refuse Disposal, Slaughterhouse, Biodegradation, Environmental, 2305 Environmental Engineering, Anaerobic digestion, Animals, Cattle, Anaerobiosis, Organic Chemicals, Methane, Abattoirs
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 178 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
