
pmid: 15497259
Structural and functional substrates of orientation processing in monkeys have been clarified. However, orientation perception in monkeys has not been fully studied. In this study, the cognitive mechanism that controls monkeys' perception of orientation was evaluated. After the monkeys were trained to discriminate between a cardinal and an oblique orientation (e.g., 0 degrees and 30 degrees), their perceptual mechanisms underlying orientation discrimination were tested by using six orientations, ranging from 0 degrees to 150 degrees, including ones used in the discrimination training. Generalization tests showed that the monkeys who were trained with cardinal orientations (e.g., 0 degrees) as positive stimuli generalized their responses to the other cardinal orientation (e.g., 90 degrees). Similarly, the monkeys who were trained with oblique orientations (e.g., 30 degrees) as positive stimuli generalized their responses to all other oblique orientations (e.g., 60 degrees, 120 degrees, and 150 degrees). These findings indicated that the monkeys abstracted the quality of the cardinal/oblique category from the physical features of orientation stimuli although they were not trained to do so. Such an abstraction also suggested a discrepancy between a continuously and orderly arranged cortical map and a discontinuously categorized perception of orientation. The present findings provide insight into the learning-correlated plasticity of cortical orientation preference.
Male, Spatial Behavior, Choice Behavior, Macaca mulatta, Functional Laterality, Generalization, Psychological, Discrimination Learning, Cognition, Discrimination, Psychological, Visual Perception, Animals, Perception, Reinforcement, Psychology
Male, Spatial Behavior, Choice Behavior, Macaca mulatta, Functional Laterality, Generalization, Psychological, Discrimination Learning, Cognition, Discrimination, Psychological, Visual Perception, Animals, Perception, Reinforcement, Psychology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
