
We first develop systematic and comprehensive interval observer designs for linear time-invariant (LTI) systems, under standard assumptions of observability and interval bounds on the initial condition and uncertainties. Traditionally, such designs rely on specific transformations into Metzler (in continuous time) or non-negative (in discrete time) forms, which may impose limitations. We demonstrate that these can be effectively replaced by an LTI transformation that is straightforward to compute offline. Subsequently, we extend the framework to time-varying systems, overcoming the limitations of conventional approaches that offer no guarantees. Our method utilizes dynamic transformations into higher-dimensional target systems, for which interval observers can always be constructed. These transformations become left-invertible after a finite time, provided the system is observable and the target dynamics are sufficiently high-dimensional and fast, thereby enabling the finite-time recovery of interval bounds in the original coordinates. Academic examples are provided to illustrate the proposed methodology.
7 pages, 3 figures
interval observer, [SPI.AUTO] Engineering Sciences [physics]/Automatic, KKL observer, time-varying system, Systems theory; control, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, linear system, uncertain system, Systems and Control (eess.SY), Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Systems and Control
interval observer, [SPI.AUTO] Engineering Sciences [physics]/Automatic, KKL observer, time-varying system, Systems theory; control, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, linear system, uncertain system, Systems and Control (eess.SY), Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Systems and Control
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
