
Block-oriented nonlinear models are popular in nonlinear modeling because of their advantages to be quite simple to understand and easy to use. To increase the flexibility of single branch block-oriented models, such as Hammerstein, Wiener, and Wiener-Hammerstein models, parallel block-oriented models can be considered. This paper presents a method to identify parallel Wiener-Hammerstein systems starting from input-output data only. In the first step, the best linear approximation is estimated for different input excitation levels. In the second step, the dynamics are decomposed over a number of parallel orthogonal branches. Next, the dynamics of each branch are partitioned into a linear time invariant subsystem at the input and a linear time invariant subsystem at the output. This is repeated for each branch of the model. The static nonlinear part of the model is also estimated during this step. The consistency of the proposed initialization procedure is proven. The method is validated on real-world measurements using a custom built parallel Wiener-Hammerstein test system.
This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license
Estimation and detection in stochastic control theory, Identification in stochastic control theory, LNL, Systems and Control (eess.SY), Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Systems and Control, Wiener-Hammerstein, parallel connection, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, Nonlinear systems in control theory, Wiener Hammerstein, nonlinear systems, system identification
Estimation and detection in stochastic control theory, Identification in stochastic control theory, LNL, Systems and Control (eess.SY), Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Systems and Control, Wiener-Hammerstein, parallel connection, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, Nonlinear systems in control theory, Wiener Hammerstein, nonlinear systems, system identification
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 39 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
