
pmid: 15756190
We report a case of intra-articular fracture of a bioabsorbable fixation device from the femoral tunnel in an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a bone-tendon-bone graft. Thirteen months after successful reconstruction surgery, the patient experienced episodes of locking and medial joint pain. There was no history of trauma and no symptoms of instability or swelling. On revision arthroscopy, a fractured tip of a bioabsorbable RIGIDfix cross pin (Mitek, Westwood, MA) was identified in the medial compartment of the knee. There was a broad area of chondral erosion affecting the medial femoral condyle and a small defect to the medial tibial plateau where the loose body had been lodged. The bone-tendon-bone graft was intact without disruption. After arthroscopy, the patient was symptom free for 3 weeks but then developed further symptoms of locking. Magnetic resonance imaging showed another loose body within the knee. A repeat arthroscopy was performed 6 weeks after the earlier procedure and another piece of the polylactic acid RIGIDfix cross pin was removed, this time from the lateral gutter. This case raises concern about the potential for breakage and resultant loose body formation that may occur after bioabsorbable cross-pin fixation and, particularly, the associated chondral damage that can occur if early intervention is not conducted.
Adult, Male, Reoperation, Bone Nails, Foreign Bodies, Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafting, Joint Loose Bodies, Arthroscopy, Foreign-Body Migration, Absorbable Implants, Humans, Equipment Failure, Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Adult, Male, Reoperation, Bone Nails, Foreign Bodies, Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafting, Joint Loose Bodies, Arthroscopy, Foreign-Body Migration, Absorbable Implants, Humans, Equipment Failure, Anterior Cruciate Ligament
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
