
handle: 2434/266145 , 2434/266079
Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), one of the major causes of failure of total joint arthroplasty, continues to pose a challenge. One of the major reasons is the lack of a ''gold standard'' to distinguish between septic and aseptic failure. Isolation of an infecting organism in otherwise confirmed PJI also may be challenging as organisms usually reside as a biofilm on the surface of the implant. This limitation can be overcome by using nonculture diagnostic tests, including inflammatory serologies, joint aspiration with fluid cell count analysis, and tissue biopsy. Imaging tests are limited in their ability to differentiate septic from aseptic joints and also are limited by cost. While radionuclide imaging modalities have yielded improved results, low accuracy for diagnosis of PJI remains. In recent years there have been some advances in diagnosis of PJI, including creation of evidence based guidelines, creation of a consensus definition of PJI, and emergence of new diagnostic tests and improved understanding of current tests. This review article will highlight some of these advances.
Microbiological Techniques, Arthritis, Infectious, Hematologic Tests, Prosthesis-Related Infections, Algorithms; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Humans; Microbiological Techniques; Predictive Value of Tests; Prosthesis-Related Infections, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Specimen Handling, C-Reactive Protein, Predictive Value of Tests, Chronic Disease, Synovial Fluid, Humans, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Algorithms
Microbiological Techniques, Arthritis, Infectious, Hematologic Tests, Prosthesis-Related Infections, Algorithms; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Humans; Microbiological Techniques; Predictive Value of Tests; Prosthesis-Related Infections, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Specimen Handling, C-Reactive Protein, Predictive Value of Tests, Chronic Disease, Synovial Fluid, Humans, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 252 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
