
The Koopman operator allows for handling nonlinear systems through a (globally) linear representation. In general, the operator is infinite-dimensional - necessitating finite approximations - for which there is no overarching framework. Although there are principled ways of learning such finite approximations, they are in many instances overlooked in favor of, often ill-posed and unstructured methods. Also, Koopman operator theory has long-standing connections to known system-theoretic and dynamical system notions that are not universally recognized. Given the former and latter realities, this work aims to bridge the gap between various concepts regarding both theory and tractable realizations. Firstly, we review data-driven representations (both unstructured and structured) for Koopman operator dynamical models, categorizing various existing methodologies and highlighting their differences. Furthermore, we provide concise insight into the paradigm's relation to system-theoretic notions and analyze the prospect of using the paradigm for modeling control systems. Additionally, we outline the current challenges and comment on future perspectives.
This is an authors' version of the work that is published in Annual Reviews in Control journal. Changes were made to this version by the publisher prior to publication
FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, FOS: Mathematics, Systems and Control (eess.SY), Dynamical Systems (math.DS), Mathematics - Dynamical Systems, Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Systems and Control, ddc: ddc:
FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, FOS: Mathematics, Systems and Control (eess.SY), Dynamical Systems (math.DS), Mathematics - Dynamical Systems, Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Systems and Control, ddc: ddc:
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 136 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
