Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Annals of Epidemiolo...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Annals of Epidemiology
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Centralized access to cancer registries

Authors: Dennis, Deapen;

Centralized access to cancer registries

Abstract

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and National Cancer Institute are seeking to improve methods to evaluate cancer as a clinical outcome in postapproval studies of drug and device safety. Challenges to monitoring cancer outcomes include years-long latency periods for many cancers, difficulty in tracking patients over long periods of time, missing outcomes of interest if relying on reporting by patients or health care providers, burden of collecting high-quality, detailed documentation of incident cancers, and low statistical power for rarer cancers.Registration of incident cancers including patient identifiers occurs in every U.S. state. Yet, each state cancer registry is administered and must be accessed separately, which creates a nearly insurmountable burden of time, effort, and cost for postmarket surveillance in multiple or all states. A voluntary process is in development which would allow states to reduce these barriers and enhance the health and safety of their residents. Called the Virtual Pooled Registry-Cancer Linkage System, state cancer registries will continue to hold and control their registry data while having access to a more streamlined process for postmarket surveillance, providing better quality, complete, and more rapid discovery.A Web-based application and review process are in development with an additional effort devoted to highly automated linkage processes and federally compliant data file transmission security.The Food and Drug Administration and National Cancer Institute will have enhanced abilities to perform high-quality postmarket surveillance and other research at lower cost and with faster speed. This system also seeks to reduce cost and burden by participating state cancer registries. This process also supports the current modifications proposed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and 15 other Federal Departments and Agencies to modernize, strengthen, and make more effective the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects known as the Common Rule.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Information Dissemination, United States Food and Drug Administration, Antineoplastic Agents, National Cancer Institute (U.S.), United States, Access to Information, Neoplasms, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing, Humans, Female, Registries, Drug Approval

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
bronze
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research