
pmid: 26573763
The present study investigates the effects of five cryoprotectants (CPAs) and cryoprotectant combinations on the post-thaw total motility, progressive motility, viability, mitochondrial membrane potential and acrosome integrity in stallion spermatozoa. In Experiment 1, the objective was to compare the impact of different concentrations (2.5%, 3.5% and 5%) of a single CPA, including glycerol (Gly), ethylene glycol (EG), dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), methyl formamide (MF), and dimethylformamide (DMF) for stallion spermatozoa cryopreservation. In Experiment 2, two or more CPAs were used to assess whether this improved post-thaw spermatozoa quality. Gly, MF and DMF, were used to prepare seven combinations of freezing extender with different mixtures of cryoprotectant, and the 3.5% Gly, MF and DMF were used as a control group. The results show that post-thaw total motility, progressive motility, viability, and mitochondrial membrane potential for all concentrations of EG and DMSO were less than the 3.5% and 5% Gly and MF and 2.5% and 3.5% DMF (P<0.05). Use of the 3.5% concentration resulted in the greater post-thaw total motility and progressive motility than the 2.5% and 5% concentrations for all CPAs. The results for the use of different combinations of cryoprotectant indicate there are differences in progressive motility and viability. The viability with the use of Gly(2/3)+MF(1/3) was 44.65% and was greater than the Gly(1/3)+MF(1/3)+DMF(1/3) (30.96%), MF(2/3)+DMF(1/3) (35.05%), Gly (32.21%) and MF(33.76%) (P<0.05). The progressive motility with the use of the MF(2/3)+Gly(1/3) combination was 36.0% and was greater than in the DMF (25.0%) and MF(2/3)+DMF(1/3) (22.7%) (P<0.05). These results suggest that using the appropriate cryoprotectant combination instead of a single cryoprotectant can improve horse spermatozoa cryopreservation.
Cryopreservation, Male, Cryoprotective Agents, Animals, Horses, Spermatozoa, Semen Preservation
Cryopreservation, Male, Cryoprotective Agents, Animals, Horses, Spermatozoa, Semen Preservation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 36 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
