Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Animal Reproduction ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Animal Reproduction Science
Article . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Ovarian follicular response to different hormonal stimulation treatments in Canindé goats

Authors: Francisco Carlos, de Sousa; Carlos Henrique, Sousa de Melo; Antônio Carlos, de Albuquerque Teles Filho; Suely Renata Gaya, Avelar; Arlindo, de Alencar Araripe Moura; Jorge André Matias, Martins; Vicente José, de Figueirêdo Freitas; +1 Authors

Ovarian follicular response to different hormonal stimulation treatments in Canindé goats

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of different hormonal stimulation treatments on the antral follicular population of naturalized Canindé goats. Adult goats (n=17) having estrous cycles at regular intervals were treated with intra-vaginal sponges containing 60 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate for 11 days, combined with an application of 50 μg d-cloprostenol on the Day 8 of treatment. For ovarian stimulation, goats were distributed into the following experimental groups: (a) multiple doses (MD), with a total of 120 mg NIH-FSH P1 in five intramuscular injections (30/30; 20/20 and 20 mg) at 12-h intervals; (b) three doses (TD), with a total of 120 mg NIH-FSH P1 in three intramuscular injections (60; 40 and 20 mg) at 24 h intervals; (c) one dose (OD), which consisted of the use of 70 mg NIH-FSH P1 combined with 200 IU eCG administered intramuscularly 36 h before sponge removal. In the MD and TD groups, FSH injections were begun on the Day 8 of progestagen treatment. The ovaries of all animals were observed by transrectal real time ultrasonography (TRU) during the follicular stimulation protocols. All follicles ≥2 mm were counted, measured and classified according to greatest diameter. The ultrasonographic assessment of the ovaries provided for well-defined ovarian structures. At the time of insertion of the sponges (Day 0), significant differences were observed (P<0.05) for the mean number of large follicles between the treated groups. Meanwhile, on Day 11, the three treatments did not differ (P<0.05), regardless of the follicular category. The diameter of small follicles was similar in MD, TD and OD during the whole period of the study. In the TD group, diameter of the large follicles was less (P<0.05) on Day 10 when compared to MD and OD. However, these differences were not observed on Day 11. In conclusion, the three treatments produced comparable distribution of the follicular populations. However, the single dose treatment can be preferred because of its simplicity and efficacious follicular response.

Keywords

Goats, Video Recording, Organ Size, Chorionic Gonadotropin, Injections, Intramuscular, Statistics, Nonparametric, Ovarian Follicle, Animals, Female, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Brazil, Ultrasonography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!