
pmid: 21784406
In pregnant women, a high negative appendectomy (NA) rate often is reported; however, the outcome of pregnancy after a NA is not well studied.Among 1,696 consecutive patients (728 men and 968 women) who underwent an appendectomy at our institution (1996-2005), 87 pregnant women were identified. Postoperative surgical and obstetric outcomes were analyzed based on the final pathologic report of the appendix (normal appendix, inflamed, or perforated).The NA rate was significantly higher in pregnant women compared with nonpregnant women (36% vs 14%; P < .05). The fetal demise rate was similar between the NA group and the inflamed group (3% vs 2%; P = NS), and highest (14%) in the perforated group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .3). Wound infections were most frequent in the perforated group (P < .05).NA during pregnancy is not free of risk to the fetus. We recommend careful assessment to avoid unnecessary exploration when appendicitis is suspected in pregnant women.
Adult, Male, Risk, Adolescent, Appendicitis, Abortion, Spontaneous, Pregnancy Complications, Young Adult, Postoperative Complications, Pregnancy, Case-Control Studies, Appendectomy, Humans, Premature Birth, Surgical Wound Infection, False Positive Reactions, Female, Fetal Death, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Male, Risk, Adolescent, Appendicitis, Abortion, Spontaneous, Pregnancy Complications, Young Adult, Postoperative Complications, Pregnancy, Case-Control Studies, Appendectomy, Humans, Premature Birth, Surgical Wound Infection, False Positive Reactions, Female, Fetal Death, Retrospective Studies
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 54 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
