Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao The American Journal...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The American Journal of Surgery
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Failed fundoplications

Authors: Kathryn F, Hatch; Michael F, Daily; Brent J, Christensen; Robert E, Glasgow;

Failed fundoplications

Abstract

Five percent of patients who undergo fundoplication will require reoperation. The cause of this high failure rate and the best management for these patients remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to identify patterns and causes of failure of primary antireflux procedures.Retrospective review of the medical records of patients who underwent revisional antireflux surgery at 2 tertiary referral centers.Between 1998 and 2003, 39 patients underwent laparoscopic revisional antireflux surgery. The time between primary and revisional surgery was 5.9 +/- 0.4 years. Primary operations included 26 laparoscopic and 13 open fundoplications. All of the 39 revisional operations were attempted laparoscopically, and there was 1 open conversion. Revisional procedures included 31 Nissen and 8 partial fundoplications. The duration of surgery was 138 +/- 10 minutes. Length of hospital stay was 2.1 +/- 0.3 days. At a mean follow-up of 6 months, reflux resolved in 94% of patients. Morbidity occurred in 23% of patients. Four types of failure were identified: type 1 = herniation of the gastroesophageal junction through the hiatus with or without the wrap (n = 21); type 2 = paraesophageal hernia (n = 9); type 3 = malformation of the wrap (n = 2). Six patients had primary wrap failure, and 1 had esophageal dysmotility.Laparoscopic revisional antireflux surgery is effective treatment for patients with failed primary fundoplications. Successful revisional surgery depends on identification and correction of the reason for primary fundoplication failure.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Reoperation, Laparotomy, Adolescent, Fundoplication, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment, Severity of Illness Index, Postoperative Complications, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Treatment Failure, Child, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Probability, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    63
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
63
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!