
pmid: 22858338
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of measurements made on 3-dimensional digital models obtained with a surface laser scanner (D-250; 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark).Twenty orthodontic dental casts of permanent dentitions were selected. Three-dimensional images were obtained on this scanner and analyzed by using the Geomagic Studio 5 software (Raindrop Geomagic, Inc, Morrisville, NC). Measurements were made with a digital caliper directly on the dental casts and also digitally on the digital models. Fifteen anatomic dental points were identified, and a total of 11 linear measurements were taken from each cast, including arch length and width. Dependent t tests were used to evaluate intraexaminer reproducibility and measurement accuracy on the digital models.No statistically significant differences were found between the measurements made directly on the dental casts and on the digital models.Linear measurements on digital models are accurate and reproducible. Digital models obtained with the surface laser scanner are reliable for measurements of arch width and length.
Cuspid, Cephalometry, Lasers, Holography, Reproducibility of Results, Molar, Models, Dental, Incisor, User-Computer Interface, Dental Arch, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Bicuspid, Software
Cuspid, Cephalometry, Lasers, Holography, Reproducibility of Results, Molar, Models, Dental, Incisor, User-Computer Interface, Dental Arch, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Bicuspid, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 162 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
