<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
To compare the effect of topical ketorolac and indomethacin on measles conjunctivitis.Prospective double-masked placebo-controlled randomized trial.Sixty-two patients with severe measles conjunctivitis were included in this study. All patients were hospitalized and randomly assigned to receive ketorolac 0.5% or indomethacin 0.1% in the right eye and artificial tears in the left eye. Conjunctival hyperemia, burning sensations, foreign-body sensations, and photophobia scores were conducted at baseline and at days seven and 14. A satisfaction score was evaluated at the end of the study.The conjunctival injection score of the control eyes was significantly higher than those of the ketorolac- and indomethacin-treated eyes at day seven (P .05). There was no significant difference in the satisfaction score among the study eyes at the end of the study (P > .05).In patients with measles during the first two weeks of infection, ketorolac and indomethacin were more effective than artificial tears in decreasing conjunctival hyperemia, but burning sensations, foreign-body sensations, and photophobia were unaffected.
Adult, Male, Turkey, Administration, Topical, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Indomethacin, Hyperemia, 630, Ketorolac Tromethamine, Conjunctivitis, Viral, Military Personnel, Double-Blind Method, Measles virus, Patient Satisfaction, Photophobia, Humans, Prospective Studies, Ophthalmic Solutions, Conjunctiva, Measles
Adult, Male, Turkey, Administration, Topical, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Indomethacin, Hyperemia, 630, Ketorolac Tromethamine, Conjunctivitis, Viral, Military Personnel, Double-Blind Method, Measles virus, Patient Satisfaction, Photophobia, Humans, Prospective Studies, Ophthalmic Solutions, Conjunctiva, Measles
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |