
arXiv: 2208.07281
Debiased recommender models have recently attracted increasing attention from the academic and industry communities. Existing models are mostly based on the technique of inverse propensity score (IPS). However, in the recommendation domain, IPS can be hard to estimate given the sparse and noisy nature of the observed user-item exposure data. To alleviate this problem, in this paper, we assume that the user preference can be dominated by a small amount of latent factors, and propose to cluster the users for computing more accurate IPS via increasing the exposure densities. Basically, such method is similar with the spirit of stratification models in applied statistics. However, unlike previous heuristic stratification strategy, we learn the cluster criterion by presenting the users with low ranking embeddings, which are future shared with the user representations in the recommender model. At last, we find that our model has strong connections with the previous two types of debiased recommender models. We conduct extensive experiments based on real-world datasets to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Electronic computers. Computer science, QA75.5-76.95, Recommendation, Information Retrieval (cs.IR), Causal inference, Computer Science - Information Retrieval
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Electronic computers. Computer science, QA75.5-76.95, Recommendation, Information Retrieval (cs.IR), Causal inference, Computer Science - Information Retrieval
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
