
Given complex numbers $m_1,l_1$ and nonnegative integers $m_2,l_2$, such that $m_1+m_2=l_1+l_2$, for any $a,b=0, ... ,\min(m_2,l_2)$ we define an $l_2$-dimensional Barnes type q-hypergeometric integral $I_{a,b}(z,��;m_1,m_2,l_1,l_2)$ and an $l_2$-dimensional hypergeometric integral $J_{a,b}(z,��;m_1,m_2,l_1,l_2)$. The integrals depend on complex parameters $z$ and $��$. We show that $I_{a,b}(z,��;m_1,m_2,l_1,l_2)$ equals $J_{a,b}(e^��,z;l_1,l_2,m_1,m_2)$ up to an explicit factor, thus establishing an equality of $l_2$-dimensional q-hypergeometric and $m_2$-dimensional hypergeometric integrals. The identity is based on the $(gl_k,gl_n)$ duality for the qKZ and dynamical difference equations.
Preprint (2003), 14 pages, AmsLaTeX, references updated
Mathematics(all), (glk, Hypergeometric integrals and functions defined by them (\(E\), \(G\), \(H\) and \(I\) functions), Knizhnik–Zamolodchikov equations, FOS: Physical sciences, Mathematical Physics (math-ph), Hypergeometric integrals, q-hypergeometric integrals, \(q\)-hypergeometric integral, Mathematics - Quantum Algebra, FOS: Mathematics, Quantum Algebra (math.QA), \(({\mathfrak{gf}}_k,{\mathfrak{gf}}_n)\) duality, Representation Theory (math.RT), Mathematical Physics, Mathematics - Representation Theory
Mathematics(all), (glk, Hypergeometric integrals and functions defined by them (\(E\), \(G\), \(H\) and \(I\) functions), Knizhnik–Zamolodchikov equations, FOS: Physical sciences, Mathematical Physics (math-ph), Hypergeometric integrals, q-hypergeometric integrals, \(q\)-hypergeometric integral, Mathematics - Quantum Algebra, FOS: Mathematics, Quantum Algebra (math.QA), \(({\mathfrak{gf}}_k,{\mathfrak{gf}}_n)\) duality, Representation Theory (math.RT), Mathematical Physics, Mathematics - Representation Theory
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
