
Specifi c features of the Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition in Eastern Central Asia and the Near East are discussed. It is concluded that the processes in these territories, as in Northern Asia, had much in common according to a number of important technological and typological characteristics, making it possible to speak of a single Eurasian scenario. Common features include primary reduction techniques, the emergence of prismatic and narrow-faced cores, the progressively increasing role of knife-like blades and microblades, the abundance of tools on blades, the standardization of the tool kit, and the predominance of Upper Paleolithic forms in the 45–38 ka time range. Generally, materials from various regions (Southern Siberia, Mongolia, Uzbekistan, and the Levant) suggest that Upper Paleolithic industries evolved from local terminal Middle Paleolithic ones throughout Northern and Central Asia and the Near East. This is attested to by the survival of certain Middle Paleolithic types at the early stages of the Upper Paleolithic.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 61 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
