
pmid: 32593641
Conventional in vitro tests to assess the aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) from inhaler devices use simple right-angle inlets ("mouth-throats", MTs) to cascade impactors, and air is drawn through the system at a fixed flow for a fixed time. Since this arrangement differs substantially from both human oropharyngeal airway anatomy and the patterns of air flow when patients use inhalers, the ability of in vitro tests to predict in vivo deposition of pharmaceutical aerosols has been limited. MTs that mimic the human anatomy, coupled with simulated breathing patterns, have yielded estimates of lung dose from in vitro data that closely match those from in vivo gamma scintigraphic or pharmacokinetic studies. However, different models of MTs do not always yield identical data, and selection of an anatomical MT and representative inhalation profiles remains challenging. Improved in vitro - in vivo correlations (IVIVCs) for inhaled drug products could permit increased reliance on in vitro data when developing new inhaled drug products, and could ultimately result in accelerated drug product development, together with reduced research and development spending.
Aerosols, Diagnostic Imaging, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, United States Food and Drug Administration, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Oropharynx, Models, Biological, United States, Administration, Inhalation, Respiratory Mechanics, Humans, Particle Size, Lung
Aerosols, Diagnostic Imaging, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, United States Food and Drug Administration, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Oropharynx, Models, Biological, United States, Administration, Inhalation, Respiratory Mechanics, Humans, Particle Size, Lung
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 45 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
