
pmid: 17919829
The current study (n=340 college students) examined individual differences in affective functioning among daily tobacco users, occasional users, and non-users. Tobacco use frequency in the past 6 months was positively associated with negative affect, affect lability, and rising reactivity while negatively associated with positive affect and falling reactivity. Multinomial logit analysis indicated that affect lability was positively associated with the likelihood of being either a non-user or a daily user relative to an occasional user. Positive affect and falling reactivity were positively associated and rising reactivity negatively associated with the likelihood of being a non-user relative to a daily user. The results indicate that daily tobacco use is associated with multiple indices of dysregulated affect. Daily tobacco use is associated with increased reactivity and decreased emotional stability coupled with decreased positive affect and a slowed rate of returning to baseline once aroused. Greater affect lability emerged as the primary affective difference between daily and occasional users.
Adult, Male, Affect, Adolescent, Humans, Female, Tobacco Use Disorder
Adult, Male, Affect, Adolescent, Humans, Female, Tobacco Use Disorder
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
