
pmid: 16875787
We examined the validity and reliability of the modified Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire (mCEQ) that assesses the degree to which subjects experience the reinforcing effects of smoking. Data came from three phase II clinical trials (n=626, n=627, n=312) on varenicline for smoking cessation. Comparative fit indexes and non-normed fit indexes from a confirmatory factor analysis exceeded 0.90. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency reliability exceeded 0.70 for the Smoking Satisfaction domain and the Psychological Reward domain but was less than 0.70 for the Aversion domain; test-retest reliability generally exceeded 0.70 on the three multi-item domains and two single items. The validity and, in general, the reliability of the postulated multidimensional framework of the mCEQ are confirmed and supported by the analyses of three independent studies, with multi-item domains on Smoking Satisfaction (satisfying, taste good, enjoy smoking), Psychological Reward (calm down, more awake, less irritable, help concentrate, reduce hunger), and Aversion (dizziness, nauseous), as well as the single-item assessment on Enjoyment of Respiratory Tract Sensations and on Craving Reduction.
Adult, Adolescent, Psychometrics, Smoking, Sensation, Reproducibility of Results, Benzazepines, Middle Aged, Double-Blind Method, Reward, Quinoxalines, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Smoking Cessation, Nicotinic Agonists, Varenicline, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Reinforcement, Psychology, Aged
Adult, Adolescent, Psychometrics, Smoking, Sensation, Reproducibility of Results, Benzazepines, Middle Aged, Double-Blind Method, Reward, Quinoxalines, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Smoking Cessation, Nicotinic Agonists, Varenicline, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Reinforcement, Psychology, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 219 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
