
Human intestinal enteroids (HIE) models have contributed significantly to our understanding of diarrheal diseases and other intestinal infections, but their routine culture conditions fail to mimic the mechanical environment of the native intestinal wall. Because the mechanical characteristics of the intestine significantly alter how pathogens interact with the intestinal epithelium, we used different concentrations of polyethylene glycol (PEG) to generate soft (~2 kPa), medium (~10 kPa), and stiff (~100 kPa) hydrogel biomaterial scaffolds. The height of HIEs cultured in monolayers atop these hydrogels was 18 μm whereas HIEs grown on rigid tissue culture surfaces (with stiffness in the GPa range) were 10 μm. Substrate stiffness also influenced the amount of enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC strain 042) adhered to the HIEs. We quantified a striking difference in adherence pattern; on the medium and soft gels, the bacteria formed clusters of >100 and even >1000 on both duodenal and jejunal HIEs (such as would be found in biofilms), but did not on glass slides and stiff hydrogels. All hydrogel cultured HIEs showed significant enrichment for gene and signaling pathways related to epithelial differentiation, cell junctions and adhesions, extracellular matrix, mucins, and cell signaling compared to the HIEs cultured on rigid tissue culture surfaces. Collectively, these results indicate that the HIE monolayers cultured on the hydrogels are primed for a robust engagement with their mechanical environment, and that the soft hydrogels promote the formation of larger EAEC aggregates, likely through an indirect differential effect on mucus.
Intestines, Stem Cells, Escherichia coli, Humans, Hydrogels, Intestinal Mucosa
Intestines, Stem Cells, Escherichia coli, Humans, Hydrogels, Intestinal Mucosa
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
