
pmid: 33931181
Tinnitus is the auditory phantom perception of a sound that severely affects the quality of life of over 300,000 people in the United Kingdom alone. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation tool, which has been investigated as a potential tinnitus management option since 2006. This study aimed to investigate the impact of tDCS and high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on tinnitus perception. A scoping review was undertaken using the framework by Arksey and O'malley (2005). After consideration of relevance, 38 primary research studies were included in the data charting to examine the impact of (HD-)tDCS on tinnitus. Twenty-two of the primary research studies reported significant therapeutic effects of (HD)-tDCS on tinnitus perception. However, only eight of these included a sham-control condition. The tDCS protocols in the studies were highly heterogeneous and sample sizes were generally small. More double-blind, sham-controlled trials are needed that use similar protocols and outcome measures before definitive conclusions about the efficacy of (HD-)tDCS for tinnitus can be drawn.
Scoping review, HD-tDCS, Neuromodulation, Review, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, tDCS, High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation, Tinnitus, Double-Blind Method, Brain stimulation, Auditory Perception, Quality of Life, Humans, Transcranial direct current stimulation, Tinnitus treatment, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Scoping review, HD-tDCS, Neuromodulation, Review, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, tDCS, High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation, Tinnitus, Double-Blind Method, Brain stimulation, Auditory Perception, Quality of Life, Humans, Transcranial direct current stimulation, Tinnitus treatment, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
