
Abstract In a randomized response (RR) survey on a sensitive character, the perception of sensitivity can vary from person to person and a section of the respondents may even be willing to disclose their true states rather than providing responses via the use of a randomization device. This opens up the prospect of allowing optional, rather than compulsory, RRs, leading to enhanced estimation efficiency. Research in this direction has received significant attention and the present chapter reviews these developments. We begin with the early work on qualitative characters and then pass on to more recent literature pertaining to quantitative characters. Results under both simple random sampling with replacement and general sampling designs are touched upon.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
