Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Nuchal Translucency

Authors: Mary E. D'Alton; Jennifer M. Walsh;

Nuchal Translucency

Abstract

All women should be offered prenatal screening or diagnostic testing for aneuploidy, regardless of maternal age, but with the increasing number of prenatal screening options now available, deciding which is the most appropriate test is increasingly complex. Nuchal translucency (NT) measurement in the first trimester is a powerful marker for Down syndrome. The combination of NT with serum markers in the first trimester detects 87% of cases of Down syndrome for a 5% false-positive rate. NT is also often increased in fetuses with a variety of other genetic conditions, including trisomies 13 and 18, Turner syndrome and triploidy, as well as structural birth defects such as congenital heart defects. Noninvasive prenatal screening using maternal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is rapidly transforming prenatal screening, with all tests providing a high sensitivity and specificity for trisomies 21 and 18. In high-risk obstetric populations, it is recommended that this form of testing now be offered as a first-line screening option. The lower prevalence of aneuploidy in younger, low-risk women increases the false positive rate in this particular population. Additionally, trisomies 13, 18, and 21 represent a lower proportion of the chromosomal abnormalities that occur in this group compared with older women. Conventional screening methods with serum analytes and NT measurements are more likely to detect other chromosomal abnormalities, as well as the risk of other adverse pregnancy outcomes. As such, conventional screening with ultrasound (US) for NT remains the most appropriate choice for first-line screening in the general obstetric population.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!