Recent developments in DXA. Quality of new DXA/MXA-devices for densitometry and morphometry
Copyright policy )Recent developments in DXA. Quality of new DXA/MXA-devices for densitometry and morphometry
The introduction of new devices demands the assessment of their capabilities in established terms. The accuracy, reproducibility and spatial resolution of in vitro (phantom) osteodensitometric and morphometric measurements of QDR 2000 Plus and EXPERT are presented. Design details of these DXA/MXA-devices are listed and discussed in combination with the data acquired in the test measurements and calculations. The image quality will improve with further software developments. The long-term reproducibility and in vivo reliability remains to be evaluated.
- Freie Universität Berlin Germany
Reproducibility of Results, Equipment Design, Image Enhancement, Bone and Bones, Spine, Models, Structural, Forearm, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Osteoporosis, Femur, Software
Reproducibility of Results, Equipment Design, Image Enhancement, Bone and Bones, Spine, Models, Structural, Forearm, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Osteoporosis, Femur, Software
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).27 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!