
There has been a lot of recent interest in the formalization of the relational data model (RDM). Many approaches may be characterized as ones oriented mainly towards declaring the components of the RDM and their interrelationships. Other approaches provide a tool for manipulating the components of RDM so that research topics on the model can be specified exactly. The latter approaches are based on formal specification methods such as denotational semantics or abstract data types. Some in the data base community experience them quite complex and cumbersome.The goal of the approach of this paper is of the latter kind. However, special attention is being paid to avoid the complexity of the formal specification methods because our notations and definitions are based on set theory. We attempt to provide an exact, convenient and general tool for specifications and proofs concerning various topics like relational query languages, query optimization, relational data base restructuring, data base design, etc.
Information storage and retrieval of data, relational database, denotational semantics, abstract data types
Information storage and retrieval of data, relational database, denotational semantics, abstract data types
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
