Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Pain measurement and pain behavior

Authors: Wilbert E, Fordyce; David, Lansky; Donald A, Calsyn; John L, Shelton; Walter C, Stolov; Daniel L, Rock;

Pain measurement and pain behavior

Abstract

This study examined relationships between chronic pain patients' ratings of pain severity, and other patient ratings about severity of associated impairment, and a series of behavioral measures of health care utilization and activity patterns. Prior to being evaluated, a sample of 150 chronic pain patients completed diary forms on which they recorded severity of pain on a 0-10 scale. Subjects were divided into high-medium-low on mean pain ratings, and were compared on the other measures obtained either from diary forms or at time of evaluation. Patient generated statements about severity of pain and extent of functional impairment from pain interrelated positively. However, these measures showed few relationships to medication consumption, health care utilization, diary recorded activity level, or to patient reported frequency counts of engaging in a set of commonplace activities. The results were interpreted to suggest that, in chronic pain, there may be a questionable relationship between what people say about their pain and what they do. Accordingly, the evaluation of chronic pain should include analyses of patient behavior.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Pain, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Medical Records, Self Concept, Activities of Daily Living, Chronic Disease, Humans, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    144
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
144
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!